{"id":954,"date":"2025-10-02T19:24:33","date_gmt":"2025-10-02T19:24:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/home\/?page_id=954"},"modified":"2025-10-29T09:44:41","modified_gmt":"2025-10-29T09:44:41","slug":"exhibit-q-contract-review-austro-contract-vs-reality","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/home\/exhibit-q-contract-review-austro-contract-vs-reality\/","title":{"rendered":"Exhibit Q \u2013 Contract Review: Austro Contract vs. Reality"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Last Updated<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-post-date\"><time datetime=\"2025-10-02T19:24:33+00:00\">October 2, 2025<\/time><\/div>\n\n\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Purpose:<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p>To compare the <strong>official Austro Construction contract scope<\/strong> with the <strong>actual work performed on-site<\/strong>, highlighting discrepancies that constitute potential fraud, false billing, and unauthorized alterations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Introduction<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p>Exhibit Q highlights the widening gap between Austro Construction\u2019s $4.85M contract for Omega Villas and the reality of work performed. The contract contained no detailed construction budget, relied on discretionary methods such as furring strips that were not code-required, and has generated cascading costs for owners including unnecessary window replacements, relocation of utilities, and disruption of peaceful enjoyment of property. Evidence presented herein \u2014 contract excerpts, photos, videos, engineering guidance, and owner testimony \u2014 demonstrates a pattern of misrepresentation, cost inflation, and selective enforcement. Taken together, these findings suggest that the project was not executed in good faith and may constitute both construction defects and financial abuse. <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Exhibit-1B.pdf\">Link<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Contract Review: Austro Contract vs. Reality<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th><strong>Contract Scope<\/strong><\/th><th><strong>Reality Onsite<\/strong><\/th><th><strong>Concern<\/strong><\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Furring strips<\/span><\/strong> only listed for fascia drip edge; no mention in wall scopes.<\/td><td><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Furring strips<\/span><\/strong> installed across exterior siding in Phases 1\u20133.<\/td><td><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Unauthorized furring strip<\/span><\/strong> scope deviation; triggered costly downstream impacts including forced window replacements.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>No <strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">roof insulation <\/span><\/strong>requirements <strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">for pitched roofs<\/span><\/strong>.<\/td><td>Multiple pitched roof assemblies completed with <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>no visible insulation<\/strong> <\/span> added back after it was removed(Units #48, #49, etc.).<\/td><td>Violation of Florida Building Code (FBC-EC R402); increased owner utility costs; potential false compliance.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Patios in Phases 1\u20134 originally had <strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">false ceilings<\/span><\/strong>; contract obligated restoration to original condition.<\/td><td>Austro attempted to avoid reinstalling patio <strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">false ceilings<\/span><\/strong> in Phases 1-3. Patty confirmed on record they must be replaced.<\/td><td>Scope avoidance and cost-cutting; potential breach of contract if not replaced.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Window systems<\/span><\/strong> excluded unless added by authorized change order.<\/td><td>Owners told <strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">window systems<\/span><\/strong> must be replaced due to furring strip installation.<\/td><td><strong>Potential fraudulent inducement:<\/strong> multi-million-dollar scheme not authorized in contract scope.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Proper testing required (ASTM E1105, E330, AAMA 502, etc.) for <strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">window fenestration systems<\/span><\/strong>.<\/td><td>S&amp;D &amp; Austro engineering <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>window system <\/strong><\/span>reports were <strong>visual-only<\/strong> (fogging, cracked panes, warped frames).<\/td><td><strong>Potential misrepresentation:<\/strong> noncompliant reports used to pressure owners into costly replacements.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Contract obligated structural <strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">foundation repairs<\/span><\/strong> as part of recertification.<\/td><td><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Foundation cracks or sunken foundations<\/span><\/strong> appear ignored or superficially patched.<\/td><td>Long-term structural risk; <strong>potential false compliance<\/strong> if signed off without proper repairs.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Fascia boards<\/span><\/strong> to be replaced with new code-compliant material.<\/td><td>Damaged\/rotted <strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">fascia boards<\/span><\/strong> concealed with <strong>wood filler<\/strong> instead of replacement.<\/td><td>Shortcut repair; <strong>potential fraudulent substitution<\/strong> of materials.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Repairs to be applied uniformly across all units.<\/td><td>Maude Bruce\u2019s unit received <strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">foundation repairs<\/span><\/strong>; Beth (plaintiff in 2023 water intrusion from <strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">foundation <\/span><\/strong>lawsuit) remains unrepaired with ongoing leaks (confirmed via email).<\/td><td>Evidence of selective enforcement; <strong>potential retaliation<\/strong> and breach of fiduciary duty.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Contract made no mention of additional owner assessments for relocating\/reinstalling <strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">A\/C units, plumbing lines, and electrical meters\/panels<\/span><\/strong> due to Austro\u2019s wall alterations.<\/td><td>Owners to be charged new <strong>special assessments<\/strong> to <strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">move\/reinstall A\/C units, plumbing lines, and electrical meters\/panels<\/span><\/strong> due to Austro\u2019s wall alterations.<\/td><td><strong>Potential cost-shifting and misrepresentation:<\/strong> contractor deviations passed to owners as new assessments.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Contract made no mention of <strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">additional owner assessments <\/span><\/strong>for relocating systems.<br><\/td><td>Board and management have <strong>discussed imposing new special assessments<\/strong> to <strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">move\/reinstall<\/span><\/strong> <strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">A\/C units, plumbing lines, and electrical meters\/panels<\/span><\/strong> as a result of Austro\u2019s wall alterations.<br><\/td><td><strong>Potential cost-shifting and misrepresentation:<\/strong> owners are being set up to absorb expenses not included in the $4.85M contract scope.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Owners are being assessed for relocation of A\/C systems, pipes, and electrical panels \u2014 costs that were not included in the $4.85M contract. These new charges stem directly from Austro\u2019s unauthorized scope deviations (e.g., wall furring strips and siding changes), making this a case of cost-shifting from contractor to owners.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Issues Identified<\/strong><\/h1>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Contract &amp; Scope Documentation<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>Q1<\/strong><\/span><\/strong> <strong>Attachments<\/strong> <\/span>\u2013 Final Austro Contract (01\/17\/2023 Version, signed) <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Construction-Signed-Contract_Redacted-v3_Redacted.pdf\">Link<\/a> (This version is online on Omega Villas website and was circulated to 128 owners plus families)\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em>This document is provided for public review to illustrate scope, pricing, and governance issues relevant to current oversight discussions. Personal data has been removed. All information is drawn from official Association records.<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Q2 Attachment<\/span><\/strong> \u2013 Exhibit A from Contract (<strong>showing fascia drip edge language only, with no furring strips listed in 1st- or 2nd-floor wall scopes<\/strong>). <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/No-Furring-Strips-6.2.25.jpg\">Link<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>Q3 Attachment<\/strong><\/span> \u2013 Change Orders (or confirmation of no change orders adding windows)\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em>Video evidence pending upload \u2013 Board Treasurer Blaire confirms no change orders submitted. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=jeYwHuUkWJc\">Link<\/a> (Patty @ 17:10 minutes into video stating not charging extra for that. <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">We have not signed one change order<\/span>. )<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Q4 Attachment<\/span><\/strong> \u2013 Manipulated Construction Scheduling &amp; Fabricated Scope\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong><em>\ud83d\udcd1 Key Findings<\/em><\/strong>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em><strong>Purpose<\/strong><br>To demonstrate how project schedules and construction scope were manipulated under Board influence, resulting in discretionary design changes \u2014 specifically the fabricated use of furring strips \u2014 that forced unnecessary costs on owners.<\/em>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em><strong>1. Construction Scheduling Manipulation<\/strong><br>Work schedules were apparently altered after Board President Patty Sabates expressed dissatisfaction that residents did not select her preferred paint colors.<br>This indicates construction sequencing was subject to personal interference, not solely engineering or safety requirements.<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em><strong>2. Fabricated Scope \u2013 Furring Strips<\/strong><br>Austro &amp; the Rogue Board allegedly introduced furring strips into the project and misrepresented them as \u201cmandatory.\u201d<br>Manufacturer standards show furring strips are optional, not required for Hardie systems.<br>This change extended walls outward, creating a condition that forced removal\/reinstallation of windows and pressured owners into <strong>expensive window replacements<\/strong>.<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em><strong>3. Material Alteration Without Approval<\/strong><br>These alterations were not included in the original Austro contract scope or construction budget.<br>Under <strong>F.S. \u00a7718.113(2)(a)<\/strong> and Bailey v. Shelborne (2020), such material alterations required 75% owner approval before commencement \u2014 approval that was never obtained.<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em><strong>\ud83d\udccc Impact on Owners<\/strong><br>Unnecessary costs imposed under the guise of \u201ccode compliance.\u201d<br>Owner choice disrupted through coercion into window packages.<br>In my opinion, this reflects both <strong>financial coercion<\/strong> and <strong>bad-faith manipulation of the project scope.<\/strong><\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u26a0\ufe0f<strong>Original Schedule Not Implemented<\/strong>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The original construction schedule, presented to owners as the basis for loan approval and project scope, was never implemented. Instead, sequencing was altered due to Board interference (e.g., paint color disputes) and discretionary design changes (e.g., fabricated furring strip requirement). This deviation from contract terms demonstrates mismanagement and lack of good-faith execution. <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Omega-Villas-40-year-Recert.-Information-11.7.2023.pdf\">Link1<\/a> &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/kXmFMtTjANc\">Video Link2<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>On-Site Construction Evidence<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Q5 Attachments<\/span><\/strong><em> <\/em>\u2013 Photo\/Video Evidence of Furring Strips Installed on Exterior Walls. <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/IMG_8267-scaled.jpeg\">Link1<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/IMG_8216-scaled.jpeg\">Link2<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image.jpeg\">Link3<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image.png\">Link4<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Furring-Strips-Horizontal-Damn-1.jpg\">Link5<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Furring-Strips-Horizontal-Damn-2.jpg\">Link6<\/a>, &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/22522fb0-c76b-4666-a603-e2d65925cd91.pdf\">Link7<\/a>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em>Confrontations documented between owners and contractors over the unauthorized use of furring strips and related scope deviations. These exchanges highlight owner objections to work not listed in the contract scope. <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/8.25.25-Gmail-to-Board.pdf\">Link1<\/a>, &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Gmail-Inspection-on-August-12-2025-at-10_00-a.m_.pdf\">Link2<\/a><\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Q6 Attachments<\/span><\/strong><em> <\/em>\u2013 Photo\/Video Evidence of Missing Pitched Roof Insulation (Units #48, #49, etc.) <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/IMG_8140.png\">Link1<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/IMG_8225-1-scaled.jpeg\">Link2<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/IMG_8232-scaled.jpeg\">Link3<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/IMG_8225-1-scaled.jpeg\">Link4<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/image-4.jpeg\">Link5<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Screenshot-2025-10-02-184022.jpg\">Link6<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Screenshot-2025-10-02-185551.jpg\">Link7<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Screenshot-2025-10-02-185658.jpg\">Link8<\/a>, &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Screenshot-2025-10-02-185928.jpg\">Link9<\/a>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em>Attached as Q6 Links are photographic and video evidence showing that insulation was not reinstalled in multiple pitched roof units (e.g., Units #48, #49). Florida Building Code requires that insulation be restored or replaced when roof assemblies are opened. Austro\u2019s omission is, in my opinion, both a code violation and an intentional cost-cutting measure at the expense of owners.<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Q7 Attachment<strong>s<\/strong><\/span><\/strong> \u2013 Photo Evidence of Installed False Ceilings (Phases 4 Patio Areas) <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Screenshot-2025-10-02-190353.jpg\">Link1<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Screenshot-2025-10-02-190433.jpg\">Link2<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Screenshot-2025-10-02-190504.jpg\">Link3<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Screenshot-2025-10-02-190519.jpg\">Link4<\/a> &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Screenshot-2025-10-02-190536.jpg\">Link5<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Q8 Attachments<\/span><\/strong> \u2013 Photo Evidence of Non-Installed False Ceilings in Phases 1\u20133 Patio Areas.\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em>Patios in Phases 1\u20134 were originally constructed with false ceilings. Austro attempted to avoid reinstalling them, but Board President Patty confirmed on record they must be replaced to match original construction.<\/em>  <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>Q9 Attachments<\/strong><\/span>\u2013 Photo\/Video Evidence of Fascia Boards Repaired with Wood Filler Instead of Replacement.\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em>Contract required replacement of rotted fascia boards, but evidence shows filler was used instead \u2014 a noncompliant shortcut and potential fraudulent substitution of materials. <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Screenshot-2025-10-02-191023.jpg\">Link1<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Screenshot-2025-10-02-191008.jpg\">Link2<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Screenshot-2025-10-02-190901.jpg\">Link3<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Screenshot-2025-10-02-191128.jpg\">Link4<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Screenshot-2025-10-02-191202.jpg\">Link5<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Screenshot-2025-10-02-191221.jpg\">Link6<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Screenshot-2025-10-02-191102.jpg\">Link7<\/a>, &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Screenshot-2025-10-02-191147.jpg\">Link8<\/a><\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>Q10 Attachments<\/strong><\/span>\u2013 Repair Records\/Photos showing completed work at BOD Maude Bruce\u2019s unit. <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Solid-Foundations-Work-Completed-Phase-4-1.8.25.pdf\">Link1<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Invoice-for-jobs-at-SF-3.pdf\">Link2<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Invoice-for-jobs-at-SF-1-1.pdf\">Link3<\/a>, &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Invoice-for-jobs-at-SF-2-2.pdf\">Link4<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Q11 Attachment<\/span><\/strong> \u2013 2023 Lawsuit Filing by Beth regarding interior water intrusion. <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Beth-Haines-Water-Leak-Suit-6.12.23.pdf\">Link<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Q12 Attachments<\/span><\/strong> \u2013 Email Confirmation showing Beth\u2019s continued water intrusion issues with <strong>no repairs scheduled<\/strong>.\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em>Repairs were selectively allocated. Maude Bruce received repairs, while Beth \u2014 who sued in 2023 for water intrusion \u2014 continues to face active leaks with no scheduled repairs. This disparity suggests retaliation and breach of fiduciary duty.<\/em> <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Multiple Links on Beth&#8217;s repair requests for the water leaking foundation discovered in her lawsuit back in 2023: <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Construction-Schedule-Changes-vs-Leaky-Roofs-7.29.24-1.pdf\">Link1<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/SM-Discussions-with-Board-over-Beths-Issues-10.2.24-1.pdf\">Link2<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/SM-Discussions-over-Beths-Issues-7.14.25-1.pdf\">Link3<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Beth-Haines-Construction-Issues-4.17.25-part-1.pdf\">Link4<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/1740-Phase-2-Foundation-Leaks-8.7.25.pdf\">Link5<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/1740-Phase-2-Foundation-Leaks-7.22.25.pdf\">Link6<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/1740-Phase-2-Foundation-Leaks-7.1.25.pdf\">Link7<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/1740-Phase-2-Foundation-Leaks-6.27.25.pdf\">Link8<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/SM-Discussions-with-Board-over-Beths-Issues-10.2.24.pdf\">Link9<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/SM-Discussions-over-Beths-Issues-7.14.25.pdf\">Link10<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Construction-Schedule-Changes-vs-Leaky-Roofs-7.29.24.pdf\">Link11<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Beth-Haines-Home-Issues-11.6.24.pdf\">Link12<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Beth-Haines-Home-Issues-10.15.24.pdf\">Link13<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Beth-Haines-Construction-Issues-4.17.25.pdf\">Link14<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Engineering Reports &amp; Owner Communications<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Q13 Attachment<\/span><\/strong> \u2013 S&amp;D Engineering Reports(showing visual-only methodology) <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/45c31740-f05e-4030-88aa-721722da5af9.pdf\">Link1<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/cb481318-f94d-4741-903d-d013517ad250.pdf\">Link2<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/95c7f5f4-6337-4ba9-b435-51844eb24557.pdf\">Link3<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/8b6d6908-5323-4c24-a30d-041c8e502918.pdf\">Link4<\/a>, &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/7c297cb7-e0fa-4dc1-b37b-089cd34e4416.pdf\">Link5<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>Q14 Attachment<\/strong><\/span><em> <\/em>\u2013 Austro Contractor Report declaring windows compromised.\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em>Evidence shows Austro attempting to <strong>complete construction by declaring existing windows \u201ccompromised,\u201d<\/strong> thereby forcing unnecessary replacements onto owners, including my own home. <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Gmail-Inspection-on-August-12-2025-at-10_00-a.m.pdf\">Link1<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Gmail-Inspection-on-August-12-2025-at-10_00-a.m_-2.pdf\">Link2<\/a>, &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Gmail-Inspection-on-August-12-2025-at-10_00-a.m_-3.pdf\">Link3<\/a>,<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em>Attorney Rhonda Hollander reinforced this pressure in correspondence, escalating legal threats to compel compliance with the contractor\u2019s position rather than protecting owners\u2019 rights. <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Gmail-Inspection-on-August-12-2025-at-10_00-a.m_5.pdf\">Link1<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/20250819_HOLLANDER-GOODE-LOPEZ-2.pdf\">Link2<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/20250819_HOLLANDER-GOODE-LOPEZ-2-1.pdf\">Link3<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Acknowledgement-of-your-enquiry-CIBCS1513015.pdf\">Link4<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ct-to-martin-7-30-25.pdf\">Link5<\/a>, Link6<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em>Sunrise Management saying that windows will fall out or need to be replaced by removing the wood t-111 siding when they are not attached to the siding but rather the studs.<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/2.-2nd-Floor-Window-Replacement-Discussion-Jay-Response.pdf\"><em>Link<\/em><\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em>\u26a0\ufe0f<strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Video Links<\/span><\/strong> of window system replacement discussions (lies on video in my opinion). <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/a0qlcZS2fjM?si=W7DtZznZrVVS5Sbf\">Link1<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Jq75TaNoDZM&amp;t=9s\">Link2<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/a3igD6yHqmA\">Link3,<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=dEnUDjlg_5I\">Link4<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/GhQM9fMj8Bg?si=J7B26J9J8YgMw4sr\">Link5<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/0TRKAJA71cE?si=mUyxN5lHdOcrnwyl\">Link6<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/9GAdlZqIcVs?si=rGA0mGs1KJzGnZzu\">Link7<\/a>, &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/sSdfxbc6LsM?si=7lLOJ-yaWkhltGBJ\">Link8<\/a> <\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Q15 Attachment<\/span><em> <\/em><\/strong>\u2013 Association Notices\/Letters to Owners stating windows required for 40-Year Recertification. <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/15.-Letter-to-unit-owners-re-start-of-04-01-24-v2.pdf\">Link1<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Q16 Attachments<\/span><\/strong> \u2013 City of Plantation Emails\/Statements Confirming Windows Are Not Part of the 40-Year Recertification. <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Carmen-11.23.pdf\">Link1<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Rudy-E-10.24.pdf\">Link2<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Rudy-E-1.24.pdf\">Link3<\/a>, &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Juda-Eskew-Accounting-Discrepancies-Noticed-Transaction-Support-Requests-6.28.24.pdf\">Link4<\/a>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong><em>\u26a0\ufe0f Key Problems<\/em><\/strong>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em><strong>Visual-Only Evidence:<\/strong> None of these reports document water penetration tests (ASTM E1105) or wind pressure tests (ASTM E330), both industry standards.<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em><strong>Circular Reasoning:<\/strong> Some reports declare windows \u201ccompromised\u201d because of damage created during removal, not because of inherent defects.<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em><strong>Burden-Shifting:<\/strong> Owners told they must either buy impact windows or install shutters at their own expense \u2014 despite no contract or statutory requirement.<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em><strong>Misrepresentation of Recertification Law:<\/strong> 40-year recertification does not mandate window replacement, but this was implied.<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Q17 Attachments<\/span><\/strong> \u2013 S&amp;D Engineering Scoping Documents and Vendor Bids related to proposed special assessments (A\/C unit relocation, plumbing reroutes, and electrical meter\/panel moves).\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em>These documents show how S&amp;D framed new system relocation work as necessary, setting the stage for additional special assessments. Vendor bids further demonstrate the financial impact that may be shifted to owners outside of the original $4.85M Austro contract scope.<\/em> <em><a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Scope-of-works-air-condition-units-DSS.pdf\">Link1<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Scope-of-works-electrical-DSS.pdf\">Link2<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Scope-of-works-internet-and-cable-boxes-DSS.pdf\">Link3<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Scope-of-works-plumbing-outlets-DSS.pdf\">Link4<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/WD_Updates_Sept15_Bundle_With_Cover-1.pdf\">Link5<\/a>, Link6<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Counter-Evidence \/ Debunking Materials<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Q18 Attachments<\/span><\/strong> \u2013 Florida 40-Year Recertification Checklist (highlighting no window replacement requirement) <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/40-Year-Building-Safety-Inspection-Program.pdf\">Link1<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/40-yearrecertification-guidelines_cofm.pdf\">Link2<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/220722-thermographic-inspections-and-clarifications.pdf\">Link3<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/miami-electrical-recertification-report-template-fillable-2025-v2.01_508-1.pdf\">Link4<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/recertification-building.pdf\">Link5<\/a>, &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/structural-recertification-report-template-fillable-2025-v2.0_remediated.pdf\">Link6<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Q19 Attachments<\/span><\/strong>\u2013 ASTM E1105 \/ ASTM E330 Testing Standards (to show required but omitted procedures) <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Exhibit_Attachment_Summary_Standards_Sheet.pdf\">Link1<\/a> &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Method_Standards_Sheet_Windows_Field_Verification-2.pdf\">Link2<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Q20 Attachment<\/span><\/strong>\u2013 Comparative Engineering Guidance (showing industry best practices for recertification and window testing)\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em><strong>Florida Building Code \u2013 Window &amp; Glazing Testing \/ Labeling<\/strong><br>The Florida Building Code requires that windows\/glass doors be tested by an approved independent laboratory and labeled to show compliance. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.floridabuilding.org\/fbc\/publications\/fact_sheets_0307\/windowsystems061506revised.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Florida Building<\/a><\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em><strong>Florida Building Code \u2013 Chapter 17: Special Inspections &amp; Tests (Exterior Windows \/ Doors)<\/strong><br>The code requires that \u201cExterior window and door assemblies shall be tested and labeled as conforming to AAMA\/WDMA\/CSA101\/I.S.2\/A440 or TAS 202\u2026\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/codes.iccsafe.org\/content\/FLBC2020P1\/chapter-17-special-inspections-and-tests?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ICC Digital Codes+2ICC Digital Codes+<\/a><\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em><strong>Broward County Building Safety Inspection Program (40-Year Recertification)<\/strong><br>Broward\u2019s program is structured around <strong>structural + electrical safety inspections<\/strong> for 40+ year buildings \u2014 it does <strong>not<\/strong> include blanket requirements of window replacement. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.broward.org\/CodeAppeals\/Documents\/Broward%20County%20Building%20Safety%20Inspection%20Program.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Broward County<\/a><\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em><strong>Florida Building Code: Exterior Window \/ Door Performance Requirements<\/strong><br>The FBC\u2019s \u201cWindow Systems\u201d fact sheet states that windows must meet wind and water intrusion performance, not guarantee lifetime replacement. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.buildingasaferflorida.org\/assets\/WindowsUpdate062520.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">buildingasaferflorida.org<\/a><\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong><em>Q21 Attachments<\/em><\/strong> \u2013 City\/County\/State Guidance Confirming 40-Year\/Milestone Recertification Covers Structural &amp; Electrical Safety (No Blanket Window Replacement Requirement)\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong><em>Key Facts:<\/em><\/strong>\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em><strong>Broward County 40-Year Program:<\/strong> Defines inspection scope as <strong>structural integrity and electrical safety<\/strong> \u2014 no mention of mandatory window replacement. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.broward.org\/Building\/Elevators\/Documents\/40%20Year%20Building%20Safety%20Inspection%20Program.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Broward County PDF<\/a>)<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em><strong>City of Plantation:<\/strong> Confirms the local Building Safety Inspection Program follows the Broward framework; focus is on <strong>structural and electrical safety<\/strong>. (<a>City of Plantation Building Safety Inspection Page<\/a>)<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em><strong>Miami-Dade Guidelines:<\/strong> Owners must prove buildings are <strong>structurally and electrically safe<\/strong> for occupancy \u2014 windows are not listed as required replacements. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.miamidade.gov\/permits\/library\/recertification-building.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Miami-Dade Recertification Guidelines<\/a>)<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em><strong>Florida SB 4-D (Milestone Inspections):<\/strong> State law specifies inspections of <strong>primary structural systems<\/strong> (slabs, load-bearing walls, roofs) \u2014 no blanket requirement to replace windows. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.floridabuilding.org\/fbc\/commission\/FBC_0722\/EB_Workgroup\/Existing_Building_Inspection_Workgroup_MDC_Presentation.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Florida Building Commission SB 4-D Overview<\/a>)<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em><strong>Florida Building Code:<\/strong> Only when windows <strong>are replaced<\/strong> must they meet impact\/shutter requirements. This is a <strong>condition of replacement<\/strong>, not a recertification trigger. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.buildingasaferflorida.org\/assets\/WindowsUpdate062520.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">Building a Safer Florida \u2013 Window Code Update<\/a>)<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Material Manipulation in Mixed Wood-Frame \/ Masonry Buildings (Phases 1\u20133)<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Late-stage furring-strip installation on mixed-construction Buildings 1\u201315:<\/strong><br>In Phases 1\u20133 \u2014 where <strong>Buildings 1 through 15 are mixed wood-frame and masonry structures<\/strong> \u2014 crews added <strong>wood furring strips near the end of the project<\/strong>, long after primary wall work had been declared complete. These strips <strong>were not part of the signed construction contract<\/strong> that secured the <strong>$4.85 million Banco Popular loan<\/strong>, nor were they reflected in the approved engineering or permitting scope.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Implied \u201cmandatory\u201d requirement under false pretenses:<\/strong><br>The <strong>Board and Association counsel<\/strong> later <strong>implied that the Miami-Dade Notice of Acceptance (NOA)<\/strong> required the installation of furring strips as part of compliance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In reality, <strong>the NOA is optional and applies only to the use of a specific approved product<\/strong>\u2014it does <strong>not mandate<\/strong> the addition of furring strips in existing wall systems. The implication that it did so it appears to create a <strong>false appearance of regulatory necessity<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>By suggesting this was a \u201crequired step,\u201d the Board and counsel possibly <strong>misled owners and inspectors into believing Austro\u2019s add-on was a compliance issue<\/strong>, when it was actually a <strong>non-contractual wall modification<\/strong>. This maneuver inflated costs, thickened walls, <strong>displaced window openings<\/strong>, and generated new owner expenses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Failure to obtain 2\/3 owner approval for material change:<\/strong><br>Compounding the problem, the <strong>Board appears to have never held or documented the required two-thirds (2\/3) membership vote<\/strong> to authorize a material alteration \u2014 the <strong>change from original wood T-111 siding to fiber-cement Hardie Board<\/strong>.<br>Under <strong>F.S. \u00a7718.113(5)<\/strong>, such a change constitutes a <strong>\u201cmaterial alteration\u201d of a condominium\u2019s common elements<\/strong>, requiring prior owner approval.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>By bypassing this statutory safeguard, the Board effectively <strong>authorized a major construction material swap without legal authority<\/strong>, committing the community to years of downstream costs \u2014 including window modifications, structural adjustments, and aesthetic mismatches \u2014 <strong>none of which were vetted or approved by owners.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Purpose and effect:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\ud83e\uddf1 <strong>Not structural:<\/strong> The added furring strips and material substitution <strong>did not strengthen<\/strong> the building \u2014 they <strong>thickened<\/strong> walls and <strong>caused alignment failures.<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\ud83d\udcb0 <strong>Scope inflation:<\/strong> The changes manufactured <strong>new billable work<\/strong> (trim rebuilds, drywall returns, re-stuccoing).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\ud83d\udd73\ufe0f <strong>Concealment:<\/strong> The new wall plane <strong>hid whether insulation or moisture barriers were ever properly installed.<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u2699\ufe0f <strong>Procedural violation:<\/strong> No 2\/3 owner vote under F.S. \u00a7718.113(5) \u2014 meaning <strong>the entire siding replacement was unauthorized.<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\ud83d\udcd1 <strong>Contract deviation:<\/strong> The furring strips and siding change were apparently <strong>absent from the Banco Popular\u2013funded scope<\/strong>, making this a <strong>post-loan alteration<\/strong> executed without full community or lender disclosure.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Result:<\/strong><br>By <strong>implying a false regulatory requirement<\/strong>, <strong>skipping the statutory owner vote<\/strong>, and <strong>deviating from the approved contract<\/strong>, the Board and its counsel appears to have turned what should have been a repair project into a <strong>material alteration without legal authority<\/strong>, exposing owners to hidden costs, permanent construction defects, and the possibility of loan or insurance noncompliance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">\u26a0\ufe0f <em>Unauthorized Material Change: From T-111 to Hardie Board Without 2\/3 Vote or Contract Authority<\/em><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>\u26a0\ufe0f Broader Implications<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Potential Fraudulent inducement:<\/strong> Owners approved a contract that did not match delivered work.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Potential False billing:<\/strong> Paid scope (insulation, engineering oversight) appears missing or misrepresented.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Potential Unpermitted alterations:<\/strong> Furring strips and forced window replacements were never part of the authorized scope.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Potential Regulatory failure:<\/strong> City of Plantation signed off on work that did not match the contract or Florida Building Code.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Improper engineering practices:<\/strong> Reliance on visual-only inspections, not code-mandated ASTM\/FBC tests.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Potential Fraudulent Inducement:<\/strong> Homeowners pressured into multi-million-dollar replacements without apparent legal or engineering basis.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Potential Vendor collusion:<\/strong> Contractors apparently used incomplete \u201cengineering\u201d reports to create artificial scope expansion.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Potential Regulatory failure:<\/strong> City and DBPR failed to enforce testing and certification standards.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>\ud83d\udccc RICO Connection<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>This Exhibit appears in my opinion to demonstrate:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Potential Fraud (18 U.S.C. \u00a7 1341, \u00a7 1343)<\/strong> \u2014 misrepresentation of contract scope and false billing.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Potential Conspiracy (18 U.S.C. \u00a7 1962(d))<\/strong> \u2014 Board, Austro, and possibly City inspectors possibly acting to conceal deviations.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Potential Predicate acts for racketeering:<\/strong> Possible fraud, obstruction of justice, retaliation against owners who questioned the discrepancies in my strong opinion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><em>These possible contract manipulations and  possible fraudulent reports may form part of the racketeering pattern documented across Exhibits S, O, and AA.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>In addition to potential fraud and racketeering, these deviations have already caused real financial harm to owners \u2014 including forced window costs, utility relocations, and increased monthly assessments not contemplated in the $4.85M contract.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>References:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/uscode\/text\/18\/part-I\/chapter-96?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">18 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 1961\u20131968 \u2013 RICO Statute<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/archives\/jm\/criminal-resource-manual-109-rico-charges?utm_source=chatgpt.com\">DOJ RICO Manual<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a>Florida Building Code \u2013 Energy Conservation R402<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last Updated Purpose: To compare the official Austro Construction contract scope with the actual work performed on-site, highlighting discrepancies that constitute potential fraud, false billing, and unauthorized alterations. Introduction Exhibit Q highlights the widening gap between Austro Construction\u2019s $4.85M contract for Omega Villas and the reality of work performed. The contract contained no detailed construction [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-954","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_hostinger_reach_plugin_has_subscription_block":false,"_hostinger_reach_plugin_is_elementor":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/954","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=954"}],"version-history":[{"count":65,"href":"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/954\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1809,"href":"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/954\/revisions\/1809"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hoajusticenow.com\/home\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=954"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}