HOA Justice Now

πŸ“Œ Supplement to Watchdog Email #4: Retrofitted Flange System – New Evidence Emerges

Date: June 10, 2025
Author: Shawn Martin, MBA
Board Member | Compliance Professional | Protected Whistleblower


πŸ” Summary

A new piece of photographic evidence has surfaced at Omega Villas: a retroactively installed flange system located on the exterior of Unit #48. This after-the-fact patchwork appears to simulate a proper furring strip setup but lacks structural integrity and was clearly not part of the original construction scope. The timing and method of installation raise new questions about continued concealment and cosmetic remediation tactics following regulatory complaints.


πŸ“Έ Evidence Description

  • Location: Exterior wall joint, Unit #48
  • System Identified: Improvised flange nailed into the transition to simulate offset
  • Condition:
    • Not part of original installation
    • Installed post-complaint periods
    • No evidence of anchoring or engineering validation
    • Lacks the hallmarks of code-compliant furring installation

⚠️ Why This Matters

This discovery visually supports ongoing allegations about the use of unauthorized furring systems across wood-frame structures. The suspicious retrofit:

  • Reinforces that original construction was flawed
  • Suggests unpermitted, reactionary behavior by contractors or property managers
  • Exposes potentially fraudulent misrepresentation tied to the $4.6M construction loan

It begs the question: Why was this done now β€” and without public disclosure?


πŸ›οΈ Systemic Failures Highlighted (Again)

β€œIf nothing else, this should at least be investigated given all the system breakdowns and red flags I’ve pointed out β€” from this Board, to the service providers and contractors, to the City, the State, the Banks, and now the Feds.”

The pattern continues:

  • Minimal transparency
  • Unpermitted modifications
  • No engineering oversight
  • Reactive cover-ups instead of structural correction

πŸ—‚οΈ What This Supports

This evidence bolsters Exhibit U (Insulation Violations), reinforces Exhibit Q (Pricing Irregularities), and aligns with Exhibit X (Video Archive), particularly those videos documenting uninspected work, suspicious fixes, and withheld permits.


πŸ“£ Final Note to Investigators and Financial Institutions

This photo is not an isolated detail β€” it’s part of a growing library of evidence that highlights how cosmetic alterations are being deployed after complaints were made. If cosmetic cover-ups are being used to mask structural and code violations, possible loan fraud, misrepresentation, or civil liability may follow.

πŸ“§ For high-resolution files or inspection coordination, please contact:
Shawn Martin, MBA – sem2000s@gmail.com

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *