In a recent email, Shawn Martin, a Director and Whistleblower at Omega Villas, sheds light on the long-standing mismanagement and financial burdens imposed on the community. As residents face yet another potential illegal “Special Assessment,” Martin outlines the detrimental impacts of past and present leadership decisions, emphasizing the urgent need for accountability.
Key Points from the Email
1. A Pattern of Mismanagement
Martin traces the community’s troubles back to 2008, when concerns about unlicensed contractors and city citations first arose. Instead of addressing these issues, the Board chose to suppress them, leading to a culture of intimidation that silenced owners.
2. Financial Exposure
The community faces over $10 million in potential liabilities linked to construction irregularities, including unauthorized work and inflated contractor charges. Additionally, more than $1 million in city fines has accumulated since 2008, often hidden from owners.
3. Retaliation Against Owners
Martin highlights alarming patterns of retaliatory actions, including foreclosure attempts against vocal owners and police involvement in board meetings, documented in over 120 videos.
4. Communication Breakdown
Current leadership has been criticized for shutting down communication, blocking necessary repairs, and withholding important records, further complicating the community’s situation.
5. Shifting Narratives on Repairs
The narrative around window replacements has shifted dramatically, from needing only caulking to mandatory replacements without proper owner votes. This raises suspicions about external influences on engineering recommendations.
6. Lack of Transparency in Siding Choices
Martin illustrates how the Board ignored the legal requirement for a two-thirds owner vote on siding selections, opting for the most expensive materials without presenting cost comparisons to owners. This decision-making process has cost the community potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars.
7. Current Assessment Issues
The recent “Special Assessment Notice” issued without proper procedures is seen as a continuation of a 17-year pattern of unauthorized decisions and inflated costs, further financially burdening the community.
Conclusion
Shawn Martin’s email is a stark reminder of the ongoing issues at Omega Villas and the pressing need for transparency and accountability. The community of 128 families has already suffered significant financial losses due to mismanagement and deceptive practices, and the latest assessment threatens to exacerbate these challenges. As residents confront these issues, it is crucial that oversight authorities take action to protect their rights and financial well-being.
In a recent email, Shawn Martin, a director and whistleblower at Omega Villas, shared a detailed recap of critical moments captured in board meeting videos that highlight a troubling pattern of influence and control within the community. This summary outlines the key points raised by Martin regarding the actions of Board President Patty Sabates and the involvement of attorney Rhonda Hollander’s firm.
Key Highlights from the Email
1. President Patty’s Control Tactics
Martin identifies several instances from board meetings that illustrate how Patty Sabates has consolidated control over Omega Villas. Key moments include:
10/24/23 Board Meeting — Board confronted about City of Plantation fines & liens. Attorneys show up by the next December 2023 meeting. Watch Clip
3/19/24 Election Meeting — Annual officer election ensuring Patty & Blaire’s bloc (5 supporting owners) re-elected board members over 2 minority owners. Brought Atty Hollander in to ensure rogue Board’s election and Officer Appointments! Watch Clip
3/19/24 Community Protest — Attorney discussion during the election meeting. Watch Clip
1/30/24 Board Meeting — Attorney advising on 40-Year Recert compliance issues and fines, including directing residents to relocate and laying groundwork for board defense strategies:
Residents relocation advice: Watch ClipRegentrification due to corruption?
1/30/24 Board Meeting — Discussion on window system replacements and confronting Board about prior notification regarding 40-Year Recert (2005–2006). Watch Clip
1/30/24 Board Meeting — Attorney discussing fines & unit owner comments. Watch Clip
5/21/24 Omega Villas Board Meeting — Police discussion & attempted removal of a board member (potentially illegal). Watch Clip
3/25/25 BOD Annual Election — Patty failed to ensure a legitimate board; rogue board members nominate each other as officers. Watch Clip
10/28/25 Board Meeting — Board explains why whistleblower (BOD member) could not attend legal committee meeting. Watch Clip
2. Concerns Over Financial Management
Martin highlights ongoing financial issues within Omega Villas, including:
The potential for excessive legal costs, with projections indicating over $125,000 in legal fees for 2025 alone.
A proposed construction assessment of over $175,000 for 2026, raising alarms about the community’s financial sustainability.
Lack of transparency surrounding budgetary decisions, which have often been cloaked in legal and security justifications.
3. Owner Retaliation and Governance Issues
A recent email exchange between an owner and Board members illustrates a pattern of retaliatory behavior. When the owner raised legitimate budget concerns, Board leadership responded defensively, framing the inquiry as “divisive” rather than addressing the issues substantively.
This pattern of silencing dissent aligns with long-documented tactics used by the Board to control narratives and suppress owner oversight.
4. Documentation and Evidence Collection
Martin emphasizes the importance of preserving evidence, including video clips from meetings and attached documents that detail governance patterns, financial analyses, and instances of retaliation. He urges oversight authorities to review this evidence and take action.
5. Call to Action
Martin requests immediate action from oversight authorities, media, and advocacy groups. He insists on the necessity of investigating potential violations of Florida condominium statutes, misuse of funds, and the ongoing retaliation against owners who seek transparency.
He encourages all involved to download and securely preserve all related evidence, underscoring the urgency of addressing these issues.
Conclusion
Shawn Martin’s email serves as a critical reminder of the ongoing challenges facing the Omega Villas community. His detailed documentation of board actions and responses highlights a broader trend of governance issues that threaten the well-being of residents and the integrity of the association. As the situation develops, it is essential for oversight authorities and community members to remain vigilant and demand accountability.
And this leads us to this series of Exhibits which is all about the Money:
Omega Villas 2026 Budget Study – A detailed analysis of projected expenses, reserve requirements, and funding gaps for 2026.
Omega Villas 2026 Proposed Budget – BOD Meeting (November 18, 2025)– Official proposed budget reviewed and voted on by the board, highlighting areas of discretionary spending, reserve allocations, and assessment planning. Highlights owner issues in affordability and attacks from President Ken Aker, former President to insure spending continues for security and legal.These exhibits provide critical context for understanding the financial decisions and potential liabilities that have influenced board actions and the ongoing disputes.
10.28.25 – Board Meeting Confrontation (Video Evidence) Recorded pre-meeting verbal confrontation initiated by Board President Patty Sabates and Treasurer Blaire Lapides in the presence of law enforcement. This incident occurred after the Board had been formally notified of the owner’s medical condition and represents a continuation of retaliatory behavior despite notice. Link:Arbitration Motion via Fax & Hollander copy via Mail 11.6.25
Cross-References:Exhibit L2 (Retaliation Timeline), Exhibit U (Police Involvement), Exhibit X (Video Archive). Related Legal Framework: F.S. §760.37; 42 U.S.C. §3617 (Fair Housing & Disability Retaliation Protections).
In a powerful email, Shawn Martin, a director and whistleblower at Omega Villas Condo Association, raises alarm over significant violations of Florida’s condominium laws by the Board of Directors and associated legal entities. Martin’s communication highlights a disturbing pattern of ignoring mandatory voting requirements, misrepresentation of projects, and a lack of accountability that has persisted for over a decade.
Summary of Key Points
1. Call for Investigation
Martin formally escalates his concerns as a whistleblower, urging state and federal authorities to investigate the Omega Villas Board and its attorneys for potential fraud. He emphasizes that these issues have been reported for 18 years without adequate response or investigation.
2. Violation of Voting Rights
The email stresses that the Board has systematically ignored the mandatory requirement for a two-thirds owner vote for changes to siding, windows, and other material alterations, as outlined in Florida Statute 718.113. Despite repeated documentation in Board minutes confirming this requirement, no votes were held.
3. Misrepresentation and Fraud
Martin accuses the Board of misrepresenting material changes as simple repairs, advancing unauthorized multimillion-dollar contracts without proper approvals. He argues that these actions reflect a deliberate pattern of fraud rather than mere oversight.
4. Failure of State Oversight
Over the past 18 years, Martin claims that state oversight bodies have failed to conduct thorough investigations into reported violations, leaving residents vulnerable to financial and emotional distress.
5. Retaliation Against Whistleblowers
Despite facing serious health challenges, including cancer, Martin continues to advocate for his community, documenting retaliatory actions against him for speaking out. He highlights the ongoing harassment and intimidation he has faced while trying to protect his home and the rights of his fellow residents.
6. Demand for Accountability
Martin calls for a full investigation into the actions of the Board, its contractors, and legal representatives. He insists that the residents of Omega Villas deserve accountability for the long-standing issues affecting their homes and finances.
Conclusion
Shawn Martin’s email serves as a critical reminder of the need for transparency and accountability within condominium associations. His call for a thorough investigation into the practices at Omega Villas underscores the potential for fraud and misconduct that can occur when oversight is lacking. As this situation unfolds, the community and relevant authorities must take these allegations seriously to ensure the rights and well-being of all residents are protected.
My Arbitration Motion to obtain another date is also attached which I had to verbally call the DBPR Arbitration unit and scale this up to get a confirmation from the Arbitrator my Arbitration was moved to December 16 – 1 day before my tumor surgery on the 18th… Refer to the attached file – Arbitration via Fax and Hollander via mail 11.6.25.pdf
2011–2023 Legal & Architectural Discussions – See the attached 2018-23 YE BOD Minutes PDFs with Legal/Architectural Discussions Highlights in Years 2018-19 & 2020-23. And, the full breakdown analysis similar to the attached file (2011 Minutes – 70 Percent Vote Required.pdf) of the Minutes I have on hand can be located at the following Links:
In a recent email, Shawn Martin, Director and Whistleblower at Omega Villas Condo Association, has raised serious concerns regarding the legality of a special assessment imposed by Your Management Services (YMS). This post summarizes key points from his communication, which highlights alleged violations of Florida statutes and the governing documents of Omega Villas.
Key Issues Raised
Lack of Owner Approval:
Martin asserts that the special assessment, which requires a two-thirds owner approval, was issued without a proper meeting or vote, violating owner rights.
Unauthorized Assessment:
The notice was issued under the YMS name, not the Board or the association’s attorney, signaling potential illegality. Martin emphasizes that a Community Association Manager (CAM) cannot impose such an assessment without authority.
Absence of Documentation:
Critical documents such as engineering reports and cost estimates were not provided, raising questions about the legitimacy of the proposed assessment. Martin calls for transparency regarding the financial implications of the assessment on the community.
Procedural Violations:
Martin points out that owners were not given adequate notice or opportunities to discuss or vote on the assessment, making it unenforceable under Florida law.
Selective Distribution:
The assessment notice was not uniformly distributed, leading to suspicions of manipulation. Some owners were targeted for immediate collection while others were not.
Potential Legal Violations:
Martin outlines several Florida statutes that may have been breached, including failures to hold proper board meetings and maintain accurate records.
Required Actions
Martin demands immediate actions from the Board and YMS, including:
Written confirmation that the special assessment is withdrawn.
An explanation of how YMS was authorized to issue the assessment.
Full disclosure of all related documents and communications.
A Call for Investigations
Martin expresses deep concern for the 128 families affected by these actions, particularly vulnerable residents such as seniors and those with disabilities. He stresses the need for state and federal authorities to investigate the matters thoroughly, given the potential for fraud and abuse of power.
Conclusion
Shawn Martin’s email serves as a crucial call to action for Omega Villas residents and relevant authorities. The concerns raised highlight the importance of transparency, accountability, and adherence to legal requirements in community management. As this situation unfolds, the community awaits a response that could determine the future of the special assessment and the overall governance at Omega Villas.
“THE OCTOBER 7 CONSTRUCTION MEETING: WINDOWS, FENCES, AND MORE HIDDEN DECISIONS”
⚠️ Overview
The October 7, 2025 Board of Directors Meeting for Omega Villas was billed as a “Construction Update,” but the agenda shows a pattern of expanded project decisions with no formal Board votes — another apparent breach of Florida Statute §718.112(2)(c)1, which requires that “a board may not take action on behalf of the association except at a meeting open to all unit owners.”
According to the official meeting recordOmega Villas Condominium Inc, topics included:
Concrete and stucco repairs
Drywall and beam replacement damage
New patio ceiling finishes
Lower and upper window “unresponsiveness” and supply discussions
Fence/gate reinstallation
AC, plumbing, and electrical vendor updates
But notably absent are:
Any documented votes or resolutions authorizing the work
Any clear scope of work approvals or financial authorizations
Owner transparency — the meeting summary lists “Open Forum” as a footnote, suggesting limited or perfunctory owner participation
🧱 Unvoted Scope Expansion
The meeting documentation indicates yet another escalation in project complexity: vendor selection for AC, plumbing, and electrical modifications was discussed, yet no minutes reflect actual owner-approved or board-voted authorizations. These appear to be non-core construction items beyond the scope of the original Banco Popular–backed project, raising questions of budget deviation and fiduciary compliance.
Similarly, the discussion of “lower window supply in storage” suggests that the Board and contractors (S&D Engineering and Austro Construction) are coordinating the purchase and storage of windows in advance of owner consent — effectively pre-committing Association fundsOmega Villas Condominium Inc.
🪟 Window Replacements and Owner Pressure
This meeting again highlights the Association’s fixation on “owner unresponsiveness” regarding window installations — echoing earlier tactics used to pressure owners into replacements rather than repairs. The October 9 Construction Agenda continues this same narrative, pairing window issues with new vendor work and unapproved modificationsGmail – October 7th BOD Mtg. 10….
The emerging pattern is clear: the Board is weaponizing maintenance notices and construction updates to drive compliance with non-voted material changes — a violation of both the Declaration and §718.113(3) (material alterations require 75% owner approval).
🧩 Pattern of Procedural Evasion
This mirrors the same procedural avoidance seen all year:
The Legal Committee authorizing arbitration filings without Board votes.
The construction scope ballooning via email directives instead of noticed meetings.
The Inspector General referral (CIG #2025-08-27-0012) still pending without acknowledgment from DBPR oversight.
Each meeting adds to a paper trail of unauthorized governance that now spans legal, financial, and physical alterations.
⚖️ The Risk for DBPR and the Board
Every undocumented vote compounds legal exposure:
Board Members risk liability under §718.111(1)(a) for acting beyond delegated authority.
Vendors and management risk being complicit in ultra vires acts.
State agencies (DBPR/Inspector General) risk enabling ongoing fraud through inaction.
🔔 Call to Action
Owners should:
Request minutes, recordings, and contractor invoices from the October 7 and 9 meetings.
Demand proof of formal Board votes authorizing any new vendor contracts.
Cite CIG Referral #2025-08-27-0012 when reporting these procedural breaches.
Notify banks, insurers, and federal oversight bodies of governance irregularities linked to loan-funded construction.
🧨 Bottom Line
When every meeting adds new work, new vendors, and new costs — without a single vote recorded — transparency is not just missing; it’s being deliberately erased.
“Shadow Committees, Secret Meetings, and the October 9 Construction Vote”
⚠️ Overview
The Omega Villas Condominium Association has scheduled another so-called Construction Meeting for Thursday, October 9 at 6:30 PM Gmail – BOD Construction meetin….
But this meeting is just the surface. Behind closed doors, a “Legal Committee” has been quietly operating — making major decisions without open votes, without public disclosure, and without any statutory authority to do so.
Under § 718.112(2)(c)1, Florida Statutes, a condominium board “may not take action on behalf of the association except at a meeting open to all unit owners.” That includes hiring attorneys, authorizing arbitration, and directing litigation.
🔎 The Legal Committee Loophole
Internal emails confirm that this “committee” has been meeting privately with counsel and advancing arbitration matters — all without a recorded Board vote or even notice to owners.
This is an abuse of the closed-meeting exception in § 718.112(2)(c)3, which allows confidential meetings only to discuss specific litigation strategy or personnel issues. Using that exception as a shield for everyday governance is a direct violation of state law and the Omega Villas By-Laws (Sections 7 and 9), which require majority approval of the Board in a properly noticed meeting.
Florida precedent makes this clear:
Berkley South Condo. Ass’n v. Williams, 584 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991): Boards can’t sidestep open-meeting laws by delegating authority to committees.
Levy v. Portofino South Condo. Ass’n, DBPR Case No. 2001-06-8120: Committees performing Board functions must meet publicly and record actions.
If this “Legal Committee” is approving legal filings, contract changes, or vendor work without an open vote, those acts are ultra vires — legally void.
🧱 Construction Scope Drift
Vendor communications from late September 2025 show an expanding Scope of Work for utility and AC modifications that was never brought to an open Board vote WD_Updates_Sept15_Bundle_With_C…9.20.25 Gmail – Clubhouse AC re…. This repeats the same pattern of concealed contracting and financial manipulation first detailed in the September 15 Watchdog Bundle.
🏚 Circular Oversight Failure
Despite the August 28 Chief Inspector General Referral (CIG #2025-08-27-0012), neither DBPR nor its Inspector General has publicly responded 9.25.25 Gmail – 🚨🚨 Circular O…. Regulators’ silence keeps allowing Omega Villas’ leadership to act in the shadows while banks and federal entities continue tracking the community’s mounting compliance and governance failures.
⚖️ Legal and Financial Exposure
Every unauthorized “Legal Committee” action exposes:
The Association – for statutory and fiduciary violations under § 718.111(1)(a);
The attorney – for engaging in actions lacking formal client authorization;
Lenders and vendors – for accepting or disbursing funds based on invalid approvals.
If those approvals drive future loan draws or escrow releases, it’s a paper trail waiting to detonate.
🔔 Call to Action
Residents and stakeholders should:
Demand release of all Legal Committee meeting minutes and legal authorizations.
Request proof of a recorded Board vote approving any arbitration or contract work.
Report violations directly to the DBPR Inspector General, referencing CIG #2025-08-27-0012.
Forward this update to your lenders and state oversight contacts.
🧨 Bottom Line
Transparency isn’t a courtesy. It appears to now be Florida law for HOAs. Any “Legal Committee” operating in secrecy is not protecting this community — it’s dismantling it from within.
In addition to the arbitration order and inspection dispute, three detailed Watchdog Updates went out on Sept. 15, 2025. Together, they document the statewide condo crisis and Omega Villas’ role as a case study in systemic failure:
On Sept. 15, 2025, the Board circulated emails discussing vendor selection. Patty asked whether to invite Live Electric, and Board members replied:
Maude: “I vote yes”
KCC: “I agree”
This exchange gives the appearance of Board business being advanced by email, inconsistent with Florida Statute § 718.112(2)(c), which allows directors to communicate by email but requires all votes to occur at properly noticed meetings open to owners.
Although later downplayed by Maritza as “not a vote,” the language and context reflect a broader problem: owners are denied transparency when decisions are framed as consensus outside open sessions.
🏦 Oversight Escalation – Chase Confirms They Are Watching
In response, I logged the exchange and copied state, federal, and lender oversight contacts. My follow-up email reminded the Board:
Chase has confirmed that it is monitoring Omega Villas’ governance events.
This means even if state agencies remain silent, lenders and federal reviewers are documenting governance failures alongside financial irregularities.
I also tied this incident to a historic pattern dating back to 2007, where similar “off-the-books” governance was captured on video.
📂 Supporting Documents – Sept. 15, 2025
The following documents are archived to support the Sept. 15, 2025 Watchdog Updates:
Chase’s Escalation to State & Federal Authorities: Link
Part 4 – Board “Email Voting” Raises Statute Concerns
This past week exposed just how far the accountability crisis has spread in Florida’s condominium oversight. At Omega Villas, unauthorized construction, financial misconduct, and agency failures continue unchecked — even as state leaders tout reforms, allocate millions to DBPR, and claim “lessons learned” post-Surfside.
The record tells a different story: systemic failure, circular oversight, and wasted taxpayer dollars.
1️⃣ Arbitration Order – Overreach Checked, Access Still in Play
⚖️ Arbitration Order – Overreach Stopped, Next Step May Be Circuit Court
On Sept. 17, 2025, the DBPR Arbitrator issued a ruling that:
✅ Stopped a Major Overreach: The Association’s attempt to use arbitration to collect payments and assessments was denied outright. This is a critical victory, showing that the Board and its attorney were trying to weaponize DBPR’s limited process for financial enforcement it was never meant to handle.
⚠️ Inspection Still Pending: The Arbitrator did not dismiss the Association’s demand for inspection access under the 40-year recertification process. While limited in scope, this raises serious concerns because prior inspections have already taken place, and new entry could be exploited to justify unauthorized furring strips, window removals, or inflated assessments.
This outcome highlights a troubling pattern: arbitration only blocks the most blatant overreach, while leaving owners vulnerable to abuse of inspection authority.
Because of this, owners are now weighing whether to escalate to Circuit Court to:
Challenge the necessity of a second inspection when prior access was already granted.
Prevent inspections from being misused as cover for construction schemes already tied to bank and federal investigations.
Establish a stronger precedent against repetitive, retaliatory entry demands.
In short: the win on financial overreach proves owners can push back — but real protection may now require Circuit Court intervention.
These rulings, spanning nearly two decades, illustrate how millions of taxpayer dollars poured into DBPR oversight have failed to resolve even basic enforcement issues.
2️⃣ Inspector General Referral – Circular Oversight Loop
On Aug. 28, 2025, the Florida Chief Inspector General issued a referral letter (CIG #2025-08-27-0012) passing the matter back to the DBPR Inspector General.
This is the same office that already declared it had no jurisdiction earlier this year. This proves the circular accountability loop:
State IG passes to DBPR IG.
DBPR IG says “no jurisdiction.”
Homeowners are left without real enforcement.
This referral has now been added to Exhibit L documenting 17 years of systemic oversight failure.
At the Sept. 19 Board Meeting, Treasurer Blaire stated that Banco Popular may extend the $4.85M loan or provide another $100k draw by 8/31/25.
This raises urgent questions:
Is Banco financing unauthorized construction tied to the furring strips and forced window replacements?
Or is Blaire misrepresenting bank involvement to mislead owners?
Either way, it points to a bank accountability gap that is now part of federal and financial oversight reviews.
⚠️ Evidence: Austro Preparing for Next Phase Construction.”
Caption: Photo evidence showing Austro’s purchase of supplies for upcoming phase work, despite ongoing disputes over unauthorized furring strips, window removals, and inspection access.
4️⃣ Cancelled Meetings & Avoidance
The August 2025 construction meeting was abruptly cancelled. Board President Patty skipped the August meeting, possibly avoiding direct confrontation after months of watchdog escalation and bank scrutiny.
Leadership instability is now obvious.
🧱 Furring Strips Misrepresentation – Core of the Crisis
On Sept. 16, 2025, I issued a mass email alert to regulators, legislators, banks, media outlets, and watchdog organizations outlining what may be the clearest example of misrepresentation and construction abuse at Omega Villas.
The Board and its contractor claimed furring strips were a mandatory code requirement for Hardie Board siding. That is not accurate.
Hardie systems allow two methods:
Direct-to-plywood with a weather-resistive barrier.
Optional rainscreen installation with furring strips.
By choosing the furring strip method, the Board:
Extended walls by 1.5 inches.
Altered window alignment and created downstream owner costs (window reinstallation, utility relocations).
Introduced risks of water entrapment, rot, and long-term structural failure.
📑 Legal Framework Ignored
F.S. §718.113(2)(a): Material alterations require a 75% owner vote before work begins.
Bailey v. Shelborne (2020): No retroactive approval allowed.
Sterling Village v. Breitenbach (1971): A material alteration = perceptible change in use, function, or appearance.
Hollywood Towers v. Hampton (2010): Board actions must be reasonable; arbitrary methods can be challenged.
F.S. §718.111(5): Entry limited to necessary maintenance, not to impose unauthorized new systems.
⚠️ Risks & Selective Enforcement
Parallel furring strips at the base block drainage → water-trapping defect.
Concrete Phases 3–4 were not given furring strips. If “mandatory,” why wasn’t it universal?
Owners now face hidden costs and structural risks without the required approval vote.
Owners were presented with a ballot that excluded the direct-to-plywood option and forced a choice only between pre-selected methods. This undermines the statutory requirement for a 75% owner vote on material alterations, as valid consent cannot be manufactured through restricted options.
Owner ballot limited to pre-selected options, excluding lawful alternatives. Link
My version that I signed in regards to this ballot. Link
No mentions of window system changes or furring strips on the only forms signed by 2/3rds votes…
👉 This construction decision is the root issue driving arbitration battles, inspection demands, and looming special assessments.
The full email alert (with legal citations and references) has been archived for public record and sent to oversight bodies.
📂 Supporting Document
Email from Dorin Frai – Board Defense of Furring Strips – Link
Email from Whistleblower to the Watchdog Group – Link
Compare Dorin’s statements with the facts and legal framework above. This direct evidence shows how the Board misrepresented a discretionary construction choice as a “mandatory code requirement.”
This past week has underscored the deep dysfunction at Omega Villas and across Florida’s oversight system. Owners continue to raise legitimate concerns, while state and financial stakeholders now face mounting evidence of circular accountability failures.
Chief Inspector General Referral – August 28, 2025
On August 28, 2025, I received correspondence from the Florida Chief Inspector General (CIG #2025-08-27-0012). While the CIG acknowledged my complaint regarding Omega Villas, the office disclaimed jurisdiction over HOAs and attorney conduct, instead referring the matter to the DBPR Inspector General for “review and action deemed appropriate.”
This development places DBPR arbitration, the post-Surfside condo law reforms (July 2024 & 2025), and attorney oversight under Inspector General review.
OIG Communication Breakdown
Separate from the referral, multiple emails to the Office of the Inspector General went unanswered for weeks, despite being sent to published intake addresses. This confirms a troubling intake and responsiveness failure at the oversight level. Homeowners should not have to chase the very offices responsible for accountability.
Circular Deflection
The referral is especially concerning given that, on May 21, 2025, the DBPR Inspector General already confirmed in writing that his office had no jurisdiction to investigate construction, permitting, or DBPR decisions in this case. By referring the matter back to the same office that disclaimed authority, the state is engaging in circular deflection rather than addressing the core issues.
Financial Concerns – Banco Loan & Special Assessments
At the August 26th Board meeting, it was revealed that Banco Popular advised the Association to consider taking an additional $100,000 draw from the $4.85M construction loan, beyond the already-approved $1.74M.
While framed as a “cushion” for unforeseen costs, this raises concerns:
Owners have not been provided with June or July financial statements.
No independent confirmation exists on whether loan draws are fully available.
Construction appears staged to suggest steady progress, but unresolved contract and scope disputes remain.
Additional “miscellaneous” special assessments have also been floated outside the 40-year recertification scope — a warning sign of escalating financial exposure for owners.
Impact
The combination of oversight failures, circular referrals, and questionable loan activity paints a troubling picture:
Regulators are failing to enforce newly-passed condo protections.
Financial institutions are being asked to extend additional credit without transparent accounting.
Homeowners face escalating risk through selective enforcement, delayed financial reporting, and potential overextension of loan obligations.
Conclusion
This case is no longer about a single community dispute — it is a systemic governance and oversight failure with direct implications for banks, regulators, and Florida’s broader condo system.
I will continue to provide updates as additional documents, financial records, and oversight responses emerge.
Shawn Martin, MBA Owner, Board Member & Protected Whistleblower – Omega Villas https://hoajusticenow.com
Subject: Watchdog Update – New Owner Evidence, Bank Case Activity, and Counsel Conduct
To: State & Federal Oversight, Financial Institutions, Media, Watchdog Orgs From: Shawn Martin, MBA – Omega Villas Unit Owner (Whistleblower) Date: 8/20/25
Executive Summary
The week of August 17–23, 2025 revealed continued failures at Omega Villas: unauthorized construction attempts, counsel retaliation, missing financials, and selective Board removals. Chase Bank has now opened multiple case files, confirming systemic risk.
New Filings & Notices (This Week)
Notice to Board re: Unauthorized Work on My Unit
I directed Austro to halt work on my unit until the unauthorized furring strips are removed and compliance is verified.
Clarified I am not refusing repairs; I am preventing further defective/unauthorized work and preserving evidence.
Confirmed I will attend the next Board meeting to address these issues on the record.
Noted the Board’s unproven legitimacy; I am appearing to represent affected owners who’ve been ignored.
Counsel Conduct – “On Record” Correspondence to Attorney Hollander
Reaffirmed no entry absent a valid court order and absent any genuine emergency/life-safety condition.
Noted prior legal notice from my prepaid attorney and reminded that all attorney statements are made under her Florida Bar license.
Placed counsel and Board on notice that further misuse of legal process or vendor coordination (including Austro) will be treated as evidence of retaliation and obstruction.
Owner Validation – Jan’s Email Thread (Reply-All)
Independent owner questioned why form letters are being billed by counsel rather than sent by management at no cost, and criticized limited owner access (3 minutes/month).
Her statements corroborate unnecessary legal spend, opaque governance, and chilled owner participation.
Bank Case Activity (Chase)
Chase opened additional complaint files aligned to discrete incidents (construction deviations, counsel enforcement, selective governance).
Each new case number indicates independent validation and builds a parallel oversight record.
Public Evidence – Video Summary Published
Whistleblower Video – July 29, 2025 Board Meeting: selective enforcement (Maude vs. Kaelani), $3.1M spent of $4.85M loan, hints of transfer-related assessments, ongoing decision‑making while under bank/federal scrutiny.
Media/Watchdogs: Note the pattern of owner corroboration, bank case proliferation, and counsel silence after being put on the record under Bar obligations.
Email-on-Official-Notice-of-Non-Consent-7.29.25.pdf; Email to Attorney Hollander: no entry w/o court order or emergency; reference to prepaid attorney notice; Bar-license statement; retaliation/obstruction warning.
Regulators/Oversight: DBPR, City of Plantation, OCC/FDIC/DOJ divisions as appropriate
Media/Watchdogs: National and Florida-focused outlets; watchdog orgs
Note on Timing
This update reflects actions taken during a construction pause, while undrawn funds remain. Institutions have a limited window to correct course before accountability is assigned publicly to all parties, including funders who remained passive.
This incident occurred after the Board had been formally notified of the owner’s medical condition and represents a continuation of retaliatory behavior despite notice. Link: 
